Skip to content

[WIP] Experimental: patch worker to only sync resource events #3474

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
perdasilva wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] Experimental: patch worker to only sync resource events #3474

perdasilva wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Dec 19, 2024

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

@dependabot
build(deps): bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.30.0 to 0.31.0 (operator…
87a3269 
…-framework#3465)

Bumps [golang.org/x/crypto](https://github.com/golang/crypto) from 0.30.0 to 0.31.0.
- [Commits](golang/crypto@v0.30.0...v0.31.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/crypto
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 19, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from oceanc80 and tmshort December 19, 2024 13:05
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/queue-fix branch 5 times, most recently from bd90101 to 8993939 Compare December 19, 2024 13:09
queue item fix
4d188d9 
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title [WIP] Experimental/QueueItemFix [WIP] Experimental: patch worker to only sync resource events Dec 19, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva closed this Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@oceanc80 oceanc80 Awaiting requested review from oceanc80

@tmshort tmshort Awaiting requested review from tmshort

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@perdasilva